I Am A Homicide Detective For The State Of Iowa - 1401 Words

It was May 16th, 2025 when I got the call asking if this was Jason and I was asked to go to small house outside of Fayette. I’m a homicide detective for the state of Iowa. When we reached the crime scene it looked like a party, but not just a regular party, it was a party of massacre. There were five victims and one survivor. The victims had six slashes and six stabs to the heart. The slashes ranged from one to three inches deep into the flesh. He also carved a satanic star in the top of each victim’s head. All this shows that the killer is psychotic, that was abundantly clear, and more than likely very dangerous to the public. I have to stop whoever did this fast before he strikes again. As I was finishing up looking threw the house to make sure there was no more evidence in the house. The whole house was full of blood splatters all over the walls. We concluded that the murderer had some sort of relation with all the victims because of how brutal the attacks were on ea ch one. Someone yelled, â€Å"Jason come here quick you might like what I found,† I went over and saw a mask thought of this odd and came to the conclusion that it was the killer’s mask. I also found a bloody suit he must have worn. After we all went outside I got a call from the hospital saying that the one survivor was out of surgery and waking up. I was asked to go down there and ask him what happened. I got there and saw that the witness was unable to talk because of the injury to the throat. I asked what hisShow MoreRelatedTrial by Fire16438 Words   |  66 Pagesand tell me about the fire,† he said, adding, â€Å"I couldn’t get my babies out.† While he was talking, a fireman emerged from the house, cradling Amber. As she was given C.P.R., Willingham, who was twenty-three years old and powerfully built, ran to see her, then suddenly headed toward the babies’ room. Monaghan and another man restrained him. â€Å"We had to wrestle with him and then handcuff him, for his and our protection,† Monaghan later told police. â€Å"I received a black eye.† One of the first firemenRead MoreTrial by Fire16445 Words   |  66 Pagesand tell me about the fire,† he said, adding, â€Å"I couldn’t get my babies out.† While he was talking, a fireman emerged from the house, cradling Amber. As she was given C.P.R., Willingham, who was twenty-three years old and powerfully built, ran to see her, then suddenly headed toward the babies’ room. Monaghan and another man restrained him. â€Å"We had to wrestle with him and then handcuff him, for his and our protection,† Monaghan later told police. â€Å"I received a black eye.† One of the first firemen

The American Dream in The Great Gatsby and The...

One of the greatest classic novels in American history, F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, lends itself to be an indispensible literary work that reinforces and challenges the core values and ideals that Benjamin Franklin expresses in his Autobiography. In the provided passage, the young Franklin arrives in Philadelphia in hopes of becoming a new self-made man and begins his journey with little money and few resources much like Gatsby. After arriving by boat, he tries to pay the people of the boat for his voyage but his payment is initially refused because he rowed the boat in order to get to Philadelphia. Franklin insists that they take his payment and says â€Å"A man is sometimes more generous when he has but a little money than when†¦show more content†¦The hero of The Great Gatsby, Jay Gatsby, also pursues the American Dream of becoming a self-made man like Franklin and models his actions after Franklin. Although Gatsby emulates Franklin’s attention to money, Gatsby ultimately fails in fulfilling his American Dream because his expectations can never satisfy his desires and the society he aspires to join is selfish. Jay Gatsby and Benjamin Franklin share the view that one’s affluence and one’s display of it are the measures of one’s success in achieving his goal. If one truly has the money required to be affluent, there will be no need to display that wealth because others will inherently know that one is rich. In fear of being thought to be poor, Gatsby and Franklin both try to exhibit whatever amount of money they may have even if they do not posses the wealth they truly desire. Franklin searches for items of monetary value in order to accumulate the resources necessary to make a reputation for his name, while Gatsby seeks to acquire the â€Å"old wealth† of East Egg in order to win the heart of his loved one, Daisy. The description of Gatsby’s personal library reveals that he only throws elaborate parties in order to prove to Daisy that he has acquired the money necessary to support a relationship with her, when in reality he can never achieve that status. D uring Nick’s first visit to Gatsby’s mansion for one of his lavish parties,Show MoreRelatedF. Scott Fitzgerald s The Great Gatsby 1303 Words   |  6 Pages Gatsby’s Great American Dream The American Dream in simple terms is the essence of Americanism; it is the belief that social mobility, prosperity, and financial success are attainable by hard work regardless of social class and nationality. The American Dream exemplifies what every immigrant imagines as they walk through Ellis Island or cross the border from Mexico. It is the ethos of America, the defining image of the average upper-middle class family man. This idea of prosperity begins asRead More Death of a Dream in Fitzgeralds The Great Gatsby Essay1480 Words   |  6 PagesGatsby and the Death of a Dream      Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  In The Great Gatsby, Fitzgerald creates the roaring twenties by showing the division of society.   The Buchanans live on one side, East Egg, and Jay Gatsby lives on the other side, West Egg.   The Buchanans belong to the socialites, yet their lives have no meaning.   Gatsby tries to chase the American Dream, yet his idea is tarnished.   He throws parties to try and fit in with the socialites.  Ã‚   Gatsbys pursuit of the American Dream is doomed because he triesRead MoreThe American Dream Through Literature1496 Words   |  6 Pagesof the American Dream. That is, that any person regardless of circumstances of birth can become successful through hard work and persistence, regardless of where they came from. Despite many arguments on whether that’s achievable or not, it continues to be a persistent topic in American culture. As such, the American Dream can be seen though literature, which often is a lens into life during the time of its writing. It wou ld make sense, then, to chronicle the appearance of the American Dream throughRead MoreThe American Dream as Shown Through Jay Gatsby Essay2729 Words   |  11 Pages Jay Gatsby becomes so enthralled in his American Dream and the immoral means that he would use to obtain it, however, that he could not see foreboding events around him. He acts in a manner of obliviousness when many of the people whom he associates with mock him, such as when and an unnamed woman in Gatsby’s house in Chapter VI gives an insincere invitation for Gatsby to come to dinner and, after Gatsby naively accepts the invitation, Tom ridicules him by asking Nick, â€Å"Doesn’t he know she doesn’tRead MoreBrief Survey of American Literature3339 Words   |  14 PagesBrief Survey of American Literature 1. Beginnings to 1700 Great mixing of peoples from the whole Atlantic basin Bloody conflicts between Native Americans (or American Indians) and European explorers and settlers who had both religious and territorial aspirations - Native American oral literature / oral tradition - European explorers’ letters, diaries, reports, etc., such as Christopher Columbus’s letters about his voyage to the â€Å"New world†. - Anglo (New England) settlers’ books, sermons

Importance of Education free essay sample

Education Is a complex subject which appears to elude definition. With the passage of time it has gathered new dimensions and stirred the human mind In unpredictable ways. Intelligent and well-meaning men have, at al tlimes, attempted to define the ideals of education in their own way. While some have emphasized its physical or moral aspects, other have laid greater stress on its intellectual or social role. John Stuart Mill holds: Whatever helps to shape the human being; to make the human being what he is, or hinder him from being what he is not is part of his education. A more satisfactory definition comes to us from Sir Richard Livingstone. He believes that education must include a vocational element , a social or, as the Greeks would have called It, a political element and a spiritual element education must help men to achieve these three ends. Education is a continuous process and it aims at the total development of the Individual. We will write a custom essay sample on Importance of Education or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The process begins with the home and progresses through school. If parents and teachers work in harmony. The mind of the child blossoms. His good and useful powers are developed in an agreeable way and his evil and useless ropensities are checked. As he moves up in the scale of time and receptivity, he begins to understand the full meaning and purpose of a liberal education. One of the main essentials of education is to provide the individual with the capacity for logical objective thinking. Without this skill It is difficult to conceive of any ones acquiring and continually expanding the knowledge which Is considered indispensable to an educated man. According to Albert Einstein, The development of general ability for independent thinking and judgement should always be placed oremost, not the acquisition of special knowledge, An educational system which is In proacuve bookish and remote from life will evidently be lopsided and serve no genuine purpose. In the conditions of modern life the rule is absolute; the race which does not value trained intelligence is doomed. A singular tribute, indeed , to the glory of the critical spirit from prof. AN. Whitehead. Equally essential Is the religion-moral element. In a way, the cultivation of morality, or right conduct or good behaviour in its widest sense, is the supreme alm of education. A curriculum can ill-afford to be blind to this object, for its importance far transcends the syllabic domain. Absence of a meaningful set of values may breed arrogance and conceit. Institutions must contribute as much as they can to the traditional virtues of humility. truth contribute as much as they can to the traditional virtues of humility, truth, honour, piety, fortitude and so on. In particular, we cannot believe that the ignorance of the Holly Quran is a suitable hallmark of educated men. A working acquaintance with this unique code of human conduct Is so obviously fundamental as not to require argument So much attention is often directed towards the mental and ethical branches of tOf2 ignored. The body, indeed, is not merely and instrument through which the mind achieves its purpose: it is a necessary condition of the very existence and efficiency of the mind. That many disorders are psychosomatic is now an accepted fact of modern life. The time-honoured maxim, a sound mind in a sound body, contains a deeper truth than many suposethe truth that a healthy mind is impossible without a healthy body. A harmonious blending of the mental, moral and physical cultures is then the ideal f a sound meaningful education. In a developing country like pakistan, the fruits of knowledge must be canalized in yet another direction as wellnamely, as a resource for national development. Thinking should make a leap from the classroom to the practical problems beyond the campus. Our educational system should be consonant with the countrys self image; it should be, in form and content, consistent with the hopes and aspirations the country holds of itself; indeed, it should be the medium through which our aspirations come to be realised

Lifes Progression Essays - Belief, Epistemology, Truth, Philosophy

Life's Progression Life's Progression Most everyone has been at a point in their lives that crucial decisions have to be made about their future. Each one of us has set specific goals that we feel need to be achieved for our future. As we grow older the goals that we set early in our young adulthood become increasingly important. We are aware of drastic changes, which will be occurring, in our lives; therefore, we place importance on a few specific goals that we feel are important to us. Upcoming retirement is becomes increasingly important to us. Employment in the military has created a sense of security. Job security is one issue; in fact, knowing the military wouldn't go out of business or lay us off has been a comfort. Another fact we haven't been required to complete a resume or attend a job interview in the last 18 years. The military provides a job, which doesn't require a resume or an interview, for a determined amount of time. This style of job seeking can lead to false sense of security; consequently, once in the civilian sector we meet a different way of doing business. A very important aspect of our lives is education. The job markets of today's society demand higher educations than ever before. For example a high school diploma is essential to obtain most jobs even those that are manual labor. Higher education enables increased salaries and benefits. Many technically skilled jobs promote healthy annual earnings and provided medical benefits, but they also require a higher level of education. Foremost in our lives should be faith. We know that with faith we can achieve the things we desire in life. Faith will help us keep focused on our goals, and provide us guidance in meeting each of them. Feel that strong faith in our beliefs will also encourage confidence in us. Conviction in our beliefs and us will facilitate demands that are required to attain the necessary goals in providing for our future. Therefore with retirement in our near future there are necessary goals we must achieve. Completion of these goals can't be done without faith in our beliefs and ourselves. With faith we can attain an education, which will smooth the process of the drastic changes that are in our future. Creative Writing

Joseth L. Lokeijak Essays - Auditoriums, Movie Theater, Theatres

Joseth L. Lokeijak ENG 111-3: Compare Contrast Final Draft Richard Newman April 5, 2017 Watching at Movie Theaters vs Watching at Home Naturally, humans always like to amuse themselves whenever they get bored, but the way of amusement differ from one time to another. Movies have become one of the biggest entertainment sources for assessing leisure times for anyone in the world, especially for families and friends. For me, movies are bigger than that, in fact they can inspire one's self and can really touch one's feelings; also they can redefine one's way of thinking. However, when watching a movie at home, is it like watching the same movie in theaters? People al ways seek for the best and now I started to wonder which one is the best when watching a movie, TV which is at home or the nice, big screen in movie theaters. Although they bear some superficial similarities, the differences between watching a movie at home and watching a movie at a movie theater are clear. Watching a movie at home or in movie theaters is an enjoyable experience for everyone depending on personal preferences. However, watching a movie at home do have many things that movie theaters do not have. For example, when people watch a movie at home they can totally have 100% privacy, so that they can discuss things they like or do not understand while watching the movie. They can also wear any clothes that are comfortable such as pajamas or frumpy clothes. Whereas going to the movies one would be dressing upeither to go on dates or to just hang out with friends or with family members. In addition to that, a person is not subject to follow any rules or guidance that one should obey or follow, basically having the right to do anything he wantssuch as pausing the movie for a while to do something , rewinding to play something he likes again or even forwarding the movie so he can skip any part in the movie that is not amusing. Whereas, one does not have that choice in movie theaters. On the other hand, watching a movie at home could be somehow disturbing, especially when watching with family members. As a result, the movie cannot be enjoyed in a nice and quiet atmosphere. Moreover, there are always something going on at home. One cannot really expect what will happen during watching a movie so that could destroy the sense of excitement or even ruin the movie. If one chooses to watch a movie at the movie theater, it is true that he will not have his own privacy. Nevertheless, he will feel the anxiety to watch the movie while being surrounded by people who also share that feeling. Movie theaters always have higher quality than homes because they have bigger screens, where the film is being displayed with a movie projector onto a large projection screen at the front of the auditorium, and better and suitable voice quality for everyone. Also movie theaters provide nice and co mfortable chairs so viewers can relax and enjoy watching the movie. But in other theaters, comfort is not an option. All its chairs are made in a certain way only allowing a person to sit in a position in which the chair is made. Comfort at home is another story. When watching at home, one can have the choice of sitting on the floor, couch, and sofa, or even lay down. Furthermore, in movie theaters, viewers will have the quiet and nighty atmosphere and will not be worrying about disturbing others while they are watching. In fact, if one brought along his family or his friends to watch a movie at a movie theater, it could be a good and memorable experience. However, movie theaters do have some disadvantages such as going to the movie theater can be more expensive than watching a movie at home. Some may find discomfort in sitting next to strangers and may even have to be aware of them. Also viewers have to follow the rules and sit appropriately. Two of the rules when being in a movie theater (which I know of) are that all viewers

Subsidies to US Auto Industry

Subsidies to US Auto Industry Over the last decade, the world has been facing economic crises. One major crisis was witnessed in 2008. In necessitated legislation of an act that would enable the government to help struggling industries survives the occasional economic depressions.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Subsidies to US Auto Industry specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In the same year, the congress passed into law a bill popularly known as the troubled asset relief programmed (Brunetti 11). This bill did not address a situation in any particular industry. However, it was made with the consideration of the difficulties that some important industries in the US economy were facing at the time. Thus, the government did not immediately move on to assist any industry that was facing problems at the time (Brunetti 13). Automobile manufacturers in the United States of America have always been a critical part of the economy. Collapse of companies in the automobile manufacturing industry could have dire consequences for the US economy. The sector also employed more than a million people. Furthermore, the number of people employed in the automobile manufacturing sector remained significant despite the decline over the last few years Late in 2008, two automotive manufactures, Chrysler Corporation and General Motors appealed to the congress to approve assistance from the government to help them avoid certain liquidation in the face of financial insolvency (Brunetti 20). While presenting the case, the companies did not argue that they were doing well in the market, but they rather tried to illustrate their efforts towards avoiding financial crises.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Their argument was that the economy would face severe ramifications if one of the major automobile manufacturers were to undergo liquida tion. No details of the projected plan were given, but the manufacturers cited substantial financial gains in general. After debate within the congress, senate, and state administration, the government decided to assist the automobile industry to avoid the impending liquidation for several companies (United States Congress, United States Congress 25). The World Trade Organization has anti subsidy rules that were formulated to ensure that there is a competitive international trade. In addition, the rules were established with the view of increasing free trade in the international arena. WTO ensured that its regulations did not cripple individual governments that wished to take corrective measures to salvage an economy that is on the verge of collapse. Thus, anti-subsidy laws are mild, and are meant to deter governments from subsidizing export and import commodities to the extent where the effect of the subsidies affects other countries and companies in the same trade. Otherwise, smal l subsidies for justifiable reasons are allowed. In addition, to regulate subsidization of products by the government, the WTO has formulated barriers in form of increased tariffs for subsidized products. These barriers are meant to be regulatory measures rather than settle scores among disputing countries. The problem is that the companies could not redeem themselves after the government gave the grants. They eventually had to be liquidated, and more money was used to establish new entities, with a significant amount of capital being contributed by the United States government.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Subsidies to US Auto Industry specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More It is obvious that the government had acted to save millions of jobs that were at stake. However, through this action, the government was actually subsidizing the American automobile industry beyond what some financial analysts consider acceptable limits. The situation at Chrysler and General Motors had been partially due to stiff competition. A bailout as substantial as that implemented by the US government seemed like interference with free trade. Most importantly, this action appeared to be a violation of the World Trade Organization’s guidelines on international trade. Other countries could consider bailing out their automobile manufacturing industries to even the scores. Alternating counteractive actions would then lead to hostile tax policies between trading partners, disrupting international trade. Thus, the United States domestic trade policies may be indirect sabotage of international trade (Webel 12). One of the conditions within the subsidies and countervailing measures as outlined by the WTO is that direct transfer of funds must be evident for the bailout to be considered a valid subsidy. In addition, the said subsidy must the directed towards a specific sector of the economy or industry. In that case, the US government’s action qualifies to be classified a subsidy. Furthermore, the US government issued funds directly to a few organizations. WTO requires signatories to its guidelines to avoid directly subsidizing those industries that manufacture goods purposely for export or import trade (Webel 18). That way, the international trade is protected from machinations of any single country. Other regulations within section II of the trade agreements ratified in Uruguay urge countries to desist from subsidizing major industries such that there is a significant effect on trade partners.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More WTO rules also specify that for a bailout to be considered a subsidy, the law of the particular country must isolate the entities being subsidized as the only industries eligible for the particular subsidy. Moreover, WTO considers any benefit of an industry acquired through foregoing of debts owed to the government amounts to a valid subsidy. Since the program was directed by congress in the United States, it qualifies as a valid subsidy to companies that deal in merchandise meant for export. The actions of the United States government contravene almost all guidelines of WTO Uruguay convention regulations (Webel 21). Any member of WTO or automobile manufacturer, which wishes to file a complaint with WTO, may prove several facts to validate its claim. One of the conditions is that the complaining entity may prove that the defendant nation caused a significant setback to the complaining entity’s domestic operations or progress. Secondly, the complaining entity may prove that th e defendant nation hindered the benefit of the complainant by subsidizing a certain industry beyond the acceptable maximum level. Finally, the complaining entity may prove that the defendant nation had prejudice in its action to subsidize a competing rival of the complainant. Several setbacks would face any country or automobile manufacturer that would wish to challenge the United States Bailout program to the WTO as a violation of WTO agreements. For WTO to accept the complaints by any country or automotive manufacturer there must be enough proof to validate the claim (Webel 24). One of the requirements is that the complainant in the case must proof that the United States government subsidized goods meant for export directly. Furthermore, there should be proof that the United States government benefited the companies that were subject to assistance. It is difficult to determine whether there was any benefit for the American automotive manufacturers. The complex procedures and disso lution of the two companies is difficult to analyze, particularly because the old business entities were eventually dissolved and new ones formed. If countermeasures were to be applied by the WTO, the implications of the past subsidies would remain, and the said measures would act just as a deterrent to any future violation of international trade laws. This means that the complainant would not be compensated for any damage caused by the subsidies. For this reason, the complainant may not be motivated to file any complaint against a subsidization that has already occurred. The lack of any financial award by WTO arbitration is a major setback to the international law (Webel 26). As of now, the subsidization of the two American automakers by the government of the United States remains a perceived action rather than a proven fact. Although is it is difficult to proof guilt or take action against the united states of America for the perceived misconduct, there are implications arising fr om reaction of the international market, foreign automotive manufacturers, and other countries that are preparing themselves to take similar action, should multinational companies operating in the country require government assistance. When subsidies are given to an industry with a significant share of international market, a degenerative effect is likely to occur. Competitiveness of companies within the international market becomes impaired by such actions. Apart from the automotive manufacturing industry, other sectors are likely to suffer from changes in trade tariff. Many of the countries involved in substantial trade with the United States may raise tariff so imports from the United States in response to the unfair subsidization of the United States motor industry. However, action by aggrieved parties may also be hampered by the economic power of the corporations that were subsidized. General Motors Corporation and Chrysler are comparatively smaller than the largest automobile manufacturers in the world (Webel 29. However, they operate on a multinational scale and employ citizens of their host countries. Closure of the two companies may make the companies lay off their workers in some of the countries. Thus, any country with interest in either General Motors or Chrysler is not likely to file any complaint against the automobile makes since such an action goes against their interest. Following the support of Chrysler and General Motors by the American government, some of Europe’s automobile manufacturers have been taking similar action though on a smaller scale. It is the difficult for WTO to impose any barrier to such action since no action has been taken against the US government decision to bailout domestic automobile manufacturers. Germany gave one and half billion Euros to Opel, a General Motors corporation subsidiary. On the other hand, France tried to influence Renault by giving the company a loan of about eight billion Euros. Britain also ga ve a loan of three million dollars to domestic automobile manufacturers (Lincicome 9). All these moves by European countries were reactions to the subsidizing of general motors and Chrysler by American government. In turn, the companies that received the said favors, continued to take actions that would indirectly benefit the countries that offered loans and bailouts. Such actions may cause mistrust and therefore fragmentation of global automobile trade. The practice may also spread to other industries, and eventually cause a global depression. It can be argued that the actions of countries that have significant manufacturing industry are a response to the actions of the United States. On the other hand, such actions may be considered efforts by the governments to salvage one of their most important industries from collapse. However, all these subsidies given to the automobile manufacturing industry around the world are a violation of WTO rules in one way or another (Lincicome 14). On careful analysis of the procedures and circumstances, one may choose to consider the actions as a part of a commercial war among the countries that host competing manufacturing industries. Although grants were given to several automotive manufacturing industries around the world, it is important to consider the circumstances of the period within which relief was offered to the manufacturers. The year 2008 had an economic depression that threatened to bog down many industries apart from the automotive manufacturing sector. In the case of United States, it is reasonable to take into account for the size of the automobile industry and its role in the economy. The jobs that Chrysler Corporation and General Motors offered to the public were too many for the government to risk losing. Such a big loss of jobs would have serious political and financial implications for the country. Thus, logic dictates that any government in a similar position would have gone to such a length to rescue t he automotive manufacturing industry. It is also possible that if the United States had sought permission or exemption from WTO or other countries with significant automotive manufacturing sector, it would have taken too long for the bailout programs to be useful to the situation in the industry (Technological innovation and public policy: the automotive industry 45). Similarly, it would have taken too long for United States government to present an amendment proposal to the WTO for consideration to favor its remedy for the automotive industry. Thus, to many observers, the United States did what was in the best interest of the citizens. Furthermore, the United States has other subsidy program for automotive makers other than the plan to bail out Chrysler and General Motors (Chong 45). For example, the United States government has endeavored to provide financial assistance to companies that sell automotive parts to Chrysler and General motors’ in order to maintain smooth trade for the organizations. In turn, manufacturing process at General motors and Chrysler is smooth. Through this mechanism, losses are avoided. However, some of the organizations that benefit from this plan are foreign companies in which the United States government has little direct interest. One can then conclude that the United States bails out companies within the country, but also provides similar assistance to companies outside the country (Chong 53). In such a situation, there is no substantial reason to allege that the United States government had prejudice against some foreign manufacturers. However much the United States government was justified in implementing its contingency plan in the case of automobile manufacturers, there is need to follow trade rules to ensure that there is cooperation in international trade (Lincicome 15). It is important for the country, which is the leading economic power, to show faith in rules and regulations that it has previously championed. The Uruguay concessions were formulated under the patronage of the United States and other leading economic powers. Consequently, it becomes hypocritical for the champion of the said laws to be the first to breach them. Although one cannot conclude that the subsidization of automotive industry in Europe was a reaction to the American case, it could still be a possibility. Thus, whether the government of the United States had a credible reason to bailout its automotive manufacturing industry or not, the fact remains that the US government breached international trade laws. Brunetti, Paul. United States Economic Policy: US subsidies in the context of World Trade Organisation. United States Economic Policy 33.5 (2011): 7-24. Print. Chong, Michael D.. Study of the crisis in the automotive sector in Canada report of the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology. Ottawa, Ont.: Canada Parliament House of Commons, 2009. Print. Lincicome, Scot. Countervailing Calamity How to Stop the Global Subsidies Race.Policy Analysis 11.7 (2012): 1-36. Print. Technological innovation and public policy: the automotive industry. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. Print. United States Congress, United States Congress. Congressional Oversight Panel September oversight report: the use of TARP funds in the support and reorganization of the domestic automotive industry.. Washington: U.S. G.P.O. :, 2009. Print. Webel, Baird. Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP): Implementation and Status. Congressional Research Service36.5 (2012): 4-33. Print.

Unlawful Discrimination II Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Unlawful Discrimination II - Assignment Example mployer (Hillbrook Manufacturing Company Ltd) because she was not remunerated on equal employment terms with her male counterparts in the same kind of job. Mrs. Lauren had worked for Hillbrook Manufacturing Company limited for more than ten years. However, during her tenure for work, she was being paid less than her male counterparts due to under assessment which was being conducted by her immediate supervisors. She decided to file a case against her employer based on gender inequality. The statutes prohibit any unfairness by the employer to the employees hence Mrs. Lauren was acting according to the law. The United States judicial system recognizes any form of partiality at the working environment. The employer in this case was being undermined and underpaid compared to her male counterparts. This is against â€Å"Equal pay Act† of United States which requires all employers to remunerate their employees equally irrespective of their gender. Also, this was characterized by inequality hence it was against Equal Employment Opportunity Act (Beiner, 2004). This act requires all workers to be treated the same way irrespective of their social, political, race or even religious background. Therefore, biasness portrayed by the employer in this case was tantamount to breach of law. When dealing with the matter of biasness in the working place, judges should first establish the truth about the alleged inequity. They have to prove that the wronged person was indeed being underpaid and under evaluated compared to other male workers. Therefore, Mrs. Lauren should provide enough evidence to affirm that she was being underpaid, and that this was due to her gender. However, it is the employee’s responsibility to notify the court and provide evidence for the allegations against the employer (Beiner, 2004). The claim must support that the employees was not given equal chances and opportunities like her male counterparts. The role of judge is providing justice to the wronged